A growing number of legal professionals, former judges, and community leaders are speaking out in support of Paul Petersen, raising concerns about the outcome of his case and calling for a thoughtful review.
These voices represent a range of backgrounds and perspectives, but share a common belief that the outcome deserves closer consideration.
Voices from the Legal Community
“Even if Paul did everything they accused him of, he has been in prison more than long enough.”
— Ken Smith, Attorney, Former Judge Pro Tem
“Logic was ignored! This was pure lawfare – EVIL.”
— Bob “Givers Gain” Wilke
“Paul’s case was so unjust. I cringe to read about it. That this could happen in America means that none of us is really safe from an unfair, politically motivated prosecution. The solution should have been an injunction—not incarceration. It should have been tested in the courts. Everyone knows that Paul would have stopped had a court determined that what he was doing was illegal.”
— Cecil Ash, Former Judge and Arizona State Legislator
“This is the most unbelievable miscarriage of justice I have ever heard of. Please add my name to your list of those who want to see an end to this prosecution.”
— Mark Anderson, Former Judge and Arizona Legislator
Support from within the legal community continues to expand, including individuals who have served as judges, prosecutors, and elected officials at both the state and local levels.
Many of these supporters point to the length of incarceration, the complexity of the legal framework involved, and the broader question of whether the outcome remains proportionate.
A Growing List of Supporters
Support for Paul Petersen now includes a broad and bipartisan group of individuals with experience in law, government, and community leadership.
Among those expressing support are:
- Former judges and prosecutors
- State legislators and public officials
- Legal professionals and policy advocates
- Community and faith leaders
Several supporters have also served on boards and commissions related to clemency, public policy, and the administration of justice.
The Human Impact
Supporters also point to the personal and family impact of continued incarceration.
Paul has now spent years away from his children, including critical years of their upbringing. For many supporters, this raises an additional question – not just about legal outcomes, but about the long-term impact on families.
This human element continues to shape how many view the case and the importance of thoughtful review.
A Call for Thoughtful Review
As more individuals become aware of the details, support continues to build for a resolution that reflects both accountability and fairness.
For many, the question is no longer just what happened, but whether the outcome continues to serve a meaningful purpose.
Related Perspective
A. Melvin “Mel” McDonald, former United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, has also shared his perspective on the case, raising concerns about sentencing and the use of incarceration.
Read: A Legal Perspective from Former U.S. Attorney Mel McDonald →Continue Exploring
Paul has always cared deeply about his family and the people he served. We continue to pray for fairness and compassion as this process moves forward.